From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Union Trust Co. v. Novotny

Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District
Aug 20, 1932
125 Cal.App. 418 (Cal. Ct. App. 1932)

Opinion

Docket No. 1036.

August 20, 1932.

MOTION to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County. Appeal dismissed.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

C.J. Novotny, in pro. per., for Appellant.

Stearns, Luce Forward for Respondent.


In support of its motion to dismiss the appeal herein for failure to file a transcript of the record within the prescribed time, respondent has filed the certificate of the county clerk as required by Rule VI of the Rules of the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal. [1] The facts set forth in such certificate are uncontradicted and it therefrom appears that notice of appeal was filed on October 13, 1931, and that neither a bill of exceptions has been settled as provided by section 650 of the Code of Civil Procedure nor has a transcript been prepared in accordance with the provisions of section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure. It further appears that the statutory period within which a record on appeal may be prepared and filed under either method has expired. Respondent's motion should therefore be granted ( General Motors etc. Corp. v. Holman, 63 Cal.App. 17 [ 217 P. 1086]; People v. Berkeley Chiropractic College, 103 Cal.App. 139 [ 283 P. 981]). The appeal is dismissed.

Marks, Acting P.J., and Morton, J., pro tem., concurred.


Summaries of

Union Trust Co. v. Novotny

Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District
Aug 20, 1932
125 Cal.App. 418 (Cal. Ct. App. 1932)
Case details for

Union Trust Co. v. Novotny

Case Details

Full title:UNION TRUST COMPANY OF SAN DIEGO (a Corporation), Respondent, v. C.J…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District

Date published: Aug 20, 1932

Citations

125 Cal.App. 418 (Cal. Ct. App. 1932)
13 P.2d 974

Citing Cases

Martin v. California Invest. Fin. Co.

Under the circumstances, we have no alternative but to dismiss the appeal. (Rule V; Union Trust Co. v.…