From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Union Trust Co. v. Cole

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 18, 1921
198 App. Div. 539 (N.Y. App. Div. 1921)

Opinion

November 18, 1921.

Root, Clark, Buckner Howland [Grenville Clark of counsel; Emory R. Buckner and Robert P. Patterson with him on the brief], for the appellants.

Miller, King, Lane Trafford [William G. Barr of counsel], for the plaintiff, respondent.

F. Herbert Wadsworth [Grant C. Fox of counsel], for the defendants, respondents.


The appellants' counsel, on the argument of the appeal, stated that the motion was made to vacate the judgment because the attorney who appeared for them had failed to serve a notice of appeal from the judgment, he representing, as was contended, conflicting interests. Our determination of the appeal taken by the guardian ad litem for the infant defendants, decided herewith ( 198 App. Div. 534), affects all of the class of which the appellants herein are a part, and will inure to their benefit although they did not appeal. ( Matter of Union Trust Co. [ Detmold], 219 N.Y. 537.) If we should reverse the order and grant the motion, the appellants could not obtain a more favorable result than they will obtain from a modification of the judgment directed on the other appeal.

The appellants may have leave to withdraw their appeal, without costs.

CLARKE, P.J., LAUGHLIN, DOWLING and MERRELL, JJ., concur.

The appellants may have leave to withdraw their appeal, without costs.


Summaries of

Union Trust Co. v. Cole

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 18, 1921
198 App. Div. 539 (N.Y. App. Div. 1921)
Case details for

Union Trust Co. v. Cole

Case Details

Full title:UNION TRUST COMPANY OF NEW YORK, as Executor, etc., of WILLIAM WASHINGTON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 18, 1921

Citations

198 App. Div. 539 (N.Y. App. Div. 1921)