From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Unger v. Pascal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 18, 1995
214 A.D.2d 431 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

April 18, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.).


The action is not barred by res judicata or collateral estoppel since the prior fee dispute and the current legal malpractice claim involve different issues (cf., Chisholm-Ryder Co. v Sommer Sommer, 78 A.D.2d 143).

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Rosenberger, Wallach, Kupferman and Nardelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Unger v. Pascal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 18, 1995
214 A.D.2d 431 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Unger v. Pascal

Case Details

Full title:RONI UNGER, Respondent, v. STEPHEN PASCAL, Appellant, et al., Defendants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 18, 1995

Citations

214 A.D.2d 431 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
625 N.Y.S.2d 898

Citing Cases

Thruway Investments v. O'Connell Aronowitz

We cannot agree. To be sure, where a client does not prevail in an action brought by counsel for the value of…