From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Underwood v. Wasko

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Apr 10, 2013
Case No. 2:11-CV-171 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 10, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 2:11-CV-171

04-10-2013

SHAWN UNDERWOOD, Plaintiff, v. FRANK WASKO, et al., Defendants.


JUDGE ALGENON L. MARBLEY


Magistrate Judge Mark R. Abel


ORDER

Based on the representation to the Court by Counsel that the parties to this lawsuit have resolved their dispute, the parties agree that the terms of their settlement agreement need not be placed upon the record at this time, but a Dismissal Order dismissing this case with prejudice shall be filed not later than fourteen (14) days from the date Plaintiff receives the Settlement Check.

This matter is now terminated by settlement and shall be considered, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41, dismissed without prejudice as to all claims, until the parties file the above-referenced Dismissal Order dismissing this matter with prejudice, unless the case is reopened for good cause shown upon proper motion of one or more parties to this action. The Court will retain continuing jurisdiction over the settlement agreement.

The Court hereby directs the U.S. District Court Clerk to serve upon all parties notice of this judgment and its date of Order upon the journal.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________

JUDGE ALGENON L. MARBLEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Underwood v. Wasko

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Apr 10, 2013
Case No. 2:11-CV-171 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 10, 2013)
Case details for

Underwood v. Wasko

Case Details

Full title:SHAWN UNDERWOOD, Plaintiff, v. FRANK WASKO, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 10, 2013

Citations

Case No. 2:11-CV-171 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 10, 2013)