From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

UMPQUA Bank v. Gunzel

Supreme Court of Washington.
Jan 5, 2022
501 P.3d 138 (Wash. 2022)

Opinion

No. 100240-8

01-05-2022

UMPQUA BANK, Petitioner, v. Charles A. GUNZEL III, et ux., Respondents.


ORDER

¶1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice González and Justices Madsen, Stephens, Yu, and Whitener, considered at its January 4, 2022, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶3 That the petition for review is denied and Respondent Charles A. Gunzel III's request for attorney fees for filing an answer to the petition for review is granted. The Respondent is awarded reasonable attorney fees and expenses pursuant to RAP 18.1(j). The amount of the attorney fees and expenses will be determined by the Supreme Court Clerk pursuant to RAP 18.1. Pursuant to RAP 18.1(d), the Respondent should file an affidavit with the Clerk of the Washington State Supreme Court. The Clerk's motion to strike the Petitioner's reply to the answer to the petition for review is granted.

For the Court

/s/ González, C.J.

CHIEF JUSTICE


Summaries of

UMPQUA Bank v. Gunzel

Supreme Court of Washington.
Jan 5, 2022
501 P.3d 138 (Wash. 2022)
Case details for

UMPQUA Bank v. Gunzel

Case Details

Full title:UMPQUA BANK, Petitioner, v. Charles A. GUNZEL III, et ux., Respondents.

Court:Supreme Court of Washington.

Date published: Jan 5, 2022

Citations

501 P.3d 138 (Wash. 2022)