From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Umpleby v. Astrue

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Valdosta Division
Mar 24, 2011
Civil Action 7:10-CV-8 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Mar. 24, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action 7:10-CV-8 (HL).

March 24, 2011


ORDER


The Recommendation (Doc. 10) of United States Magistrate Judge Thomas Q. Langstaff, entered March 1, 2011, is before the Court. The Magistrate Judge recommends that the Commissioner's decision in Plaintiff's Social Security appeal be affirmed pursuant to Sentence Four of § 405(g). Plaintiff did not file a written objection to the Recommendation.

The Court has reviewed the Recommendation and finds no clear error in the Magistrate Judge's decision. Accordingly, the Court accepts the Recommendation (Doc. 10). The decision of the Commissioner is affirmed pursuant to Sentence Four of § 405(g).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Umpleby v. Astrue

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Valdosta Division
Mar 24, 2011
Civil Action 7:10-CV-8 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Mar. 24, 2011)
Case details for

Umpleby v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:SHARON UMPLEBY, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Valdosta Division

Date published: Mar 24, 2011

Citations

Civil Action 7:10-CV-8 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Mar. 24, 2011)