From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ulster Savings Bank v. Bash

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 28, 1985
114 A.D.2d 500 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

October 28, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Burchell, J.).


Order reversed, with costs, motion granted, and matter remitted to the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, for further proceedings.

At a mortgage foreclosure sale, appellant, the highest bidder, attempted to make his down payment with a combination of cash and two out-of-State bank checks made out to the Referee. The Referee informed appellant that this form of payment did not comply with the terms of sale which called for cash or certified checks. Appellant then asked the Referee to sign the checks so that he could cash them. She refused to do so, even though she could have indorsed them "without recourse" (see, UCC 3-414). Thereupon, the Referee reopened the bidding and accepted a bid $10,000 lower than appellant's and allowed this second bidder an opportunity to convert his bank check, made payable to himself, to cash for the down payment.

The Referee's actions, although not fraudulent, cast an aura of unfairness over the conduct of the sale and, therefore, we exercise our discretion to set it aside (see, United States v Thwaites Place Assoc., 548 F. Supp. 94, affd 722 F.2d 729). Gibbons, J.P., Brown, Niehoff and Eiber, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ulster Savings Bank v. Bash

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 28, 1985
114 A.D.2d 500 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Ulster Savings Bank v. Bash

Case Details

Full title:ULSTER SAVINGS BANK, Formerly ULSTER COUNTY SAVINGS BANK, Formerly ULSTER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 28, 1985

Citations

114 A.D.2d 500 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

United States Trust Company v. Simon

Ordered that the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs are awarded one bill of costs.…

Chase v. Rajendran

6] ["The Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in setting aside the foreclosure sale based on the…