From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ulster Oil Transportation Corp. v. Meldrum

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Jan 25, 1956
229 F.2d 568 (2d Cir. 1956)

Opinion

No. 229, Docket 23407.

Argued January 10, 11, 1956.

Decided January 25, 1956.

Martin J. McHugh, New York City (Macklin, Speer, Hanan McKernan, New York City, on the brief), for libelant-appellant.

Frank C. Mason, New York City (Mahar Mason, New York City, on the brief), for Matton Towing Corp., claimant-respondent-appellee.

Warren J. Martin, New York City (Foley Martin, New York City, on the brief), for Red Star Towing Transportation Co., claimant-impleaded-appellee.

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and FRANK and LUMBARD, Circuit Judges.


Judge Byers' opinion and findings, D.C.E.D.N.Y., 122 F. Supp. 767, which are fully sustained in the record, demonstrate that no negligence can be charged to either towing or passing tug for the three-inch stone found in the side bottom of libelant's barge after it had rubbed along the bank of the New York State Barge Canal. We also find point in the judge's remark that with so large a barge in so small a channel "navigation in the Barge Canal is attended by certain obvious perils," 122 F. Supp. 767, 769, apparent to the owners.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Ulster Oil Transportation Corp. v. Meldrum

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Jan 25, 1956
229 F.2d 568 (2d Cir. 1956)
Case details for

Ulster Oil Transportation Corp. v. Meldrum

Case Details

Full title:ULSTER OIL TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION, as owner of THE Barge PETROLEUM NO…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Jan 25, 1956

Citations

229 F.2d 568 (2d Cir. 1956)

Citing Cases

United Fruit Co. v. Mobile Towing Wrecking Co.

However, scarcely that appears except from the fact of the collision itself. The obvious normal hazard of…