From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ullman v. Stolzenberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 11, 1932
234 App. Div. 463 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)

Opinion

February 11, 1932.

Appeal from Supreme Court of New York County.

Joseph Gans, for the respondent Irving Stolzenberg, for the motion.

William L. Greenfogel, for the appellants, opposed.

Present — FINCH, P.J., MERRELL, McAVOY, MARTIN and SHERMAN, JJ.


Since the decision of the appeal from the order denying plaintiff's motion for an injunction pendente lite, the parties have entered into a stipulation whereunder all of the issues herein, as well as the matter of the attorney's lien, will soon be tried and meanwhile a part of the judgment has been stipulated to be paid and the balance thereof secured by a bond.

Under these circumstances, the status quo has been maintained so that in the end the rights of all parties will be safeguarded and enforced. In deciding, as a matter of discretion, to grant to plaintiffs a preliminary injunction, this court did not undertake to determine the equities in the case or to forecast that plaintiffs were entitled to recover. These are matters which are to be disposed of by the Special Term upon testimony to be given at the trial of the issues.

Accordingly, the motion for a reargument and other alternative relief should be denied, without costs.


Motion for reargument and other alternative relief denied, without costs.


Summaries of

Ullman v. Stolzenberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 11, 1932
234 App. Div. 463 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)
Case details for

Ullman v. Stolzenberg

Case Details

Full title:LOUIS ULLMAN and Another, Appellants, v. JACOB STOLZENBERG and Others…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 11, 1932

Citations

234 App. Div. 463 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)
256 N.Y.S. 569