Oral pronouncements of an agency at a duly noticed hearing control over a written order which is inconsistent with those pronouncements. Cf., e.g., Ulano v. Anderson, 626 So.2d 1112 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993) ("Reversal is required where a final judgment is inconsistent with a trial court's oral pronouncements."). Beyond the normal rule requiring that a written order reflect the tribunal's earlier pronouncements, three specific considerations lead to reversal here. First, all meetings of the Board are public meetings subject to notice requirements.