Opinion
3:08-cv-0285-LDG-RAM 3:08-cv-0621-LDG-RAM 3:09-cv-0167-LDG-RAM 3:09-cv-0649-LDG-RAM 3:09-cv-0715-LDG-RAM 3:10-cv-0463-LDG-RAM
03-27-2013
ALICIA UHOUSE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, et al., Defendants. BILL ADAMSON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. LARRY J. MOORE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants. JAMES ADGETT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. BILL ADAMSON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. JASON AMES, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant.
(Adamson I)
(Adamson II)
In conformity with the previously announced subdivision of pending motions, and in the further interests of case management of this litigation,
THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that the following motions are DENIED without prejudice subject to their reinstatement by the court in the due course of the aforementioned proceedings:
Uhouse v. Bureau of Reclamation, 3:08-cv-0285-LDG
Plaintiffs' motion to reconsider the magistrate judge's order denying plaintiffs' motion to enforce settlement (#428)Adamson v. United States, 3:08-cv-0621-LDG
Motion for summary judgment as to ten specific claims (#212)Moore v. United States, 3:09-cv-0167-LDG
Motion to set date for trial (#215)Adgett v. United States, 3:09-cv-0649-LDG
Motion for summary judgment as to ten specific claims (#147)Adamson v. United States, 3:09-cv-0715-LDG
Motion to set a date for trial (#157)
Motion for summary judgment as to ten specific claims (#149)Ames v. United States, 3:10-cv-0463-LDG
Renewed motion to dismiss claims of 168 enumerated plaintiffs as untimely (#166)
Motion to set a date for trial (#108)
_________________________________
Lloyd D. George
United States District Judge