From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Uhl v. Town of Lantana

Supreme Court of Florida
Oct 12, 1966
190 So. 2d 753 (Fla. 1966)

Opinion

No. 35484.

October 12, 1966.

Writ of Certiorari to the Florida Industrial Commission.

Harry Goodmark, West Palm Beach, C. DuBose, Ausley, Ausley, Ausley, McMullen, O'Bryan, Michaels McGehee, Tallahassee, for petitioner.

Sullivan Anstead, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.


By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date of April 22, 1966.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rules, rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

It is further ordered that the petitioner's petition for allowance of attorneys' fees, be and the same is hereby denied.

THORNAL, C.J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Uhl v. Town of Lantana

Supreme Court of Florida
Oct 12, 1966
190 So. 2d 753 (Fla. 1966)
Case details for

Uhl v. Town of Lantana

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD G. UHL, PETITIONER, v. TOWN OF LANTANA, INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Oct 12, 1966

Citations

190 So. 2d 753 (Fla. 1966)