From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

UDR Eight80 I LP v. Chaney

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 20, 2022
SACV 22-01320-CJC(ADSx) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 20, 2022)

Opinion

SACV 22-01320-CJC(ADSx)

07-20-2022

UDR EIGHT80 I LP v. JANET CHANEY


PRESENT: HONORABLE CORMAC J. CARNEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER REMANDING ACTION TO STATE COURT

Defendant seeks to remove this eviction proceeding to federal court, invoking this Court's federal question jurisdiction. Defendant states no cognizable basis for federal question jurisdiction. Instead, she makes a vague statement that the determination of a demurrer she filed in state court involves federal law. But it is axiomatic that a federal defense or counter-claim does not give rise to federal-question jurisdiction. Franchise Tax Bd. v. Constr. Laborers Vacation Trust for S. Cal., 463 U.S. 1, 14 (1983). The Court REMANDS this action to state court.


Summaries of

UDR Eight80 I LP v. Chaney

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 20, 2022
SACV 22-01320-CJC(ADSx) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 20, 2022)
Case details for

UDR Eight80 I LP v. Chaney

Case Details

Full title:UDR EIGHT80 I LP v. JANET CHANEY

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jul 20, 2022

Citations

SACV 22-01320-CJC(ADSx) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 20, 2022)