From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Udoh v. Knutson

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Jun 9, 2021
CIVIL 19-1311 (MJD/HB) (D. Minn. Jun. 9, 2021)

Opinion

CIVIL 19-1311 (MJD/HB)

06-09-2021

EMEM UFOT UDOH, Petitioner, v. NATE KNUTSON, Respondent.

Emem Ufot Udoh, pro se. Jonathan P. Schmidt, Assistant Hennepin County Attorney, Counsel for Respondent.


Emem Ufot Udoh, pro se.

Jonathan P. Schmidt, Assistant Hennepin County Attorney, Counsel for Respondent.

ORDER

Michael J. Davis Judge

The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer dated April 14, 2021. Petitioner Emem Ufot Udoh has filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. [Docket Nos. 117, 118, 119, 122]

Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review upon the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Bowbeer dated April 14, 2021.

Accordingly, based upon the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer dated April 14, 2021 [Docket No. 116].

2. Petitioner's Emem Ufot Udoh's Emergency Motion for Release [Docket No. 106] is DENIED.

3. Petitioner's Motion for Miscellaneous Relief [Docket No. 109] is DENIED.


Summaries of

Udoh v. Knutson

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Jun 9, 2021
CIVIL 19-1311 (MJD/HB) (D. Minn. Jun. 9, 2021)
Case details for

Udoh v. Knutson

Case Details

Full title:EMEM UFOT UDOH, Petitioner, v. NATE KNUTSON, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, District of Minnesota

Date published: Jun 9, 2021

Citations

CIVIL 19-1311 (MJD/HB) (D. Minn. Jun. 9, 2021)