From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.C.L. Realty Co. v. Brown

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Dec 2, 1948
193 Misc. 801 (N.Y. App. Term 1948)

Opinion

December 2, 1948.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, GOODMAN, J.

John T. Doles, Jr., for appellant.

Leo Rosenberg for respondent.


The landlord has failed to show that the tenant is using or occupying his apartment as a gambling house or for any illegal purpose within the purview of subdivision 5 of section 1410 of the Civil Practice Act. Under that section the term "use" implies the doing of something customarily or habitually, or making a practice of doing a certain act, and the single act of the tenant alleged in this case is insufficient to warrant recovery of possession ( Estate of Shaff v. Stein, 171 Misc. 376).

The final order should be reversed, with $30 costs, and petition dismissed, with costs.

HAMMER, HOFSTADTER and PECORA, JJ., concur.

Final order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

U.C.L. Realty Co. v. Brown

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Dec 2, 1948
193 Misc. 801 (N.Y. App. Term 1948)
Case details for

U.C.L. Realty Co. v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:U.C.L. REALTY CO., Landlord, Respondent, v. JAMES BROWN, Tenant, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Dec 2, 1948

Citations

193 Misc. 801 (N.Y. App. Term 1948)
84 N.Y.S.2d 840

Citing Cases

Lituchy v. Lathers

The term "use" of premises for illegal purposes implies doing of something customarily or habitually upon the…

Kings County District Attorney's Office v. Freshley

This motion was denied for the reasons amplified below. Addressing these points in reverse order, while it is…