Opinion
No. 07-7435.
Submitted: February 28, 2008.
Decided: March 6, 2008.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (6:06-cv-01686-PMD).
Charles Tyson, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Jonathan Bridgmon, Ruskin C. Foster, McCutchen, Blanton, Johnson Barnette, LLP, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Charles Tyson appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Tyson v. Eagleton, No. 6:06-cv-01686-PMD, 2007 WL 2477337 (D.S.C. Aug. 29, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.