From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tyler v. Tyler

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Dec 8, 1914
144 P. 1023 (Okla. 1914)

Opinion

No. 3727

Opinion Filed December 8, 1914.

APPEAL AND ERROR — Ruling on Demurrer to Evidence — Reservation for Review — Motion for New Trial — Necessity. The ruling on a demurrer to the evidence is a decision occurring on the trial; and, in order to enable the Supreme Court to review such ruling, it is necessary that a motion for a new trial be filed within the time prescribed by law.

(Syllabus by Thacker, C.)

Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; John J. Carney, Judge.

Action by Julia A. Tyler against Lucian H. Tyler. Demurrer to defendant's evidence sustained, and defendant brings error, and plaintiff applies for an order directing the clerk to issue execution on judgment. Appeal dismissed.

M. Fulton and R. E. Bowling, for plaintiff in error.


This cause is brought here for the purpose of reversing a judgment of the trial court sustaining a demurrer to the evidence. The case-made filed herein fails to show any motion for new trial was filed. The appeal, therefore, under authority of Insurance Company of North America v. Little, 34 Okla. 499, 125 P. 1098; Ardmore Oil Milling Co. v. Doggett Grain Co., 32 Okla. 280, 122 P. 241; Stump v. Porter, 31 Okla. 157, 120 P. 639, and James v. Jackson, 30 Okla. 190, 120 P. 288, should be dismissed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Tyler v. Tyler

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Dec 8, 1914
144 P. 1023 (Okla. 1914)
Case details for

Tyler v. Tyler

Case Details

Full title:TYLER v. TYLER

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Dec 8, 1914

Citations

144 P. 1023 (Okla. 1914)
144 P. 1023

Citing Cases

WILSON v. BUIE

In order to review the action of the trial court in sustaining the demurrer to the evidence it is necessary…

Sac & Fox Oil Co. v. Owens

"Error occurring during the trial cannot be considered by the Supreme Court, unless a motion for a new trial,…