From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Twitty v. Tousignant

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Feb 14, 2006
No. 9:04-CV-0222 (N.D.N.Y. Feb. 14, 2006)

Opinion

No. 9:04-CV-0222.

February 14, 2006


DECISION ORDER


This action, brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, was referred by this Court to the Honorable Randolph F. Treece, United States Magistrate Judge, for a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 72.3(c).

No objections to the Amended Report-Recommendation dated December 28, 2005 have been filed. After examining the record, this Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice. Accordingly, this Court adopts the Report-Recommendation for the reasons stated therein. It is therefore, ORDERED that the Complaint be DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Twitty v. Tousignant

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Feb 14, 2006
No. 9:04-CV-0222 (N.D.N.Y. Feb. 14, 2006)
Case details for

Twitty v. Tousignant

Case Details

Full title:ANTONIE TWITTY, Plaintiff, v. A TOUSIGNANT, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: Feb 14, 2006

Citations

No. 9:04-CV-0222 (N.D.N.Y. Feb. 14, 2006)