From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Twiss v. Lotter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1931
232 App. Div. 783 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)

Opinion

February, 1931.


Order modified by providing that the examination of each defendant shall be limited to the operation of his own car and as so modified affirmed, without costs, upon stipulation by counsel for the respondent upon the argument. In any event, clearly the scope of the examination is too broad and general. Examination of defendant Lotter to proceed on five days' notice at the place and hour stated in the order; examination of defendant Ferris to proceed on the following day at the same place and hour on similar notice. Lazansky, P.J., Young, Hagarty, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Twiss v. Lotter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1931
232 App. Div. 783 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)
Case details for

Twiss v. Lotter

Case Details

Full title:NELLIE L. TWISS, Respondent, v. LE ROY LOTTER and JOSEPH FERRIS, Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 1, 1931

Citations

232 App. Div. 783 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)