From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Turunen v. Dep't of Natural Res. Dir.

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Oct 5, 2016
SC: 154465 (Mich. Oct. 5, 2016)

Opinion

SC: 154465

10-05-2016

ROGER TURUNEN, d/b/a HOGAN LAND IMPROVEMENT CO., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIRECTOR and DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, Defendants-Appellants.


Order

154465 & (15)(16) Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Joan L. Larsen, Justices COA: 332811
Baraga CC: 12-006259-CZ

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the September 12, 2016 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for stay is DENIED.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 5, 2016

/s/_________

Clerk


Summaries of

Turunen v. Dep't of Natural Res. Dir.

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Oct 5, 2016
SC: 154465 (Mich. Oct. 5, 2016)
Case details for

Turunen v. Dep't of Natural Res. Dir.

Case Details

Full title:ROGER TURUNEN, d/b/a HOGAN LAND IMPROVEMENT CO., Plaintiff-Appellee, v…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Oct 5, 2016

Citations

SC: 154465 (Mich. Oct. 5, 2016)