From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Turner v. Valor Merch. Servs. Co.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Oct 18, 2023
C 23-03381 WHA (N.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2023)

Opinion

C 23-03381 WHA

10-18-2023

TERRANCE TURNER, Plaintiff, v. VALOR MERCHANT SERVICES COMPANY, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

WILLIAM ALSUP, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The undersigned has reviewed the report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero and agrees that this action should be dismissed for failure to pay the filing fee (Dkt. No. 8). In other words, plaintiff has failed to prosecute his case. No objection was received in response to the report. The report contains one inaccuracy in stating that plaintiff has not consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge when he has (Dkt. No. 5). Nevertheless, because defendant has not done so, reassignment of this action was proper. See Williams v. King, 875 F.3d 500, 503-04 (9th Cir. 2017). This order ADOPTS IN FULL the report and recommendations of Judge Spero with the foregoing correction. For the reasons stated therein, this action is DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Turner v. Valor Merch. Servs. Co.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Oct 18, 2023
C 23-03381 WHA (N.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2023)
Case details for

Turner v. Valor Merch. Servs. Co.

Case Details

Full title:TERRANCE TURNER, Plaintiff, v. VALOR MERCHANT SERVICES COMPANY, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Oct 18, 2023

Citations

C 23-03381 WHA (N.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2023)