From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Turner v. Turner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 9, 1995
216 A.D.2d 910 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

June 9, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Whelan, J.

Present — Pine, J.P., Lawton, Wesley, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff served a complaint against defendant Robert Turner, Sr. (Turner) in August 1986 and an amended complaint against him in February 1987. Turner failed to answer either the original or amended complaint, but plaintiff did not move for a default judgment until November 1993, almost seven years after service of the amended complaint. Supreme Court properly dismissed the complaint against Turner as abandoned (see, Sanders v. Marino Falcone Brick Contr., 133 A.D.2d 342, 343).

If a plaintiff "fails to take proceedings for the entry of judgment within one year after [a] default", the complaint will be dismissed as abandoned unless plaintiff can establish that (1) the failure to seek a default judgment within one year after the default is excusable and (2) the cause of action is meritorious (CPLR 3215 [c]; see, Blades v. Butler Cab Corp., 176 A.D.2d 698, 699, lv dismissed 79 N.Y.2d 851; Memorial Hosp. v. Wilkins, 143 A.D.2d 494; Morton v. Morton, 136 A.D.2d 902; Sanders v. Marino Falcone Brick Contr., supra). The contention of plaintiff that her delay in prosecuting the action is excusable because she and Turner had entered into a stipulation extending Turner's time to answer the complaint is without merit. In order for the purported stipulation extending Turner's time to answer to be given effect it must have been in writing and signed by the parties or their attorneys, or reduced to the form of an order and entered (see, CPLR 2104; Dobbins v. County of Erie, 58 A.D.2d 733). No such stipulation appears in the record. The other proffered excuses for plaintiff's delay in prosecuting the action are conclusory, irrelevant or unsupported by the record.

In light of our determination, we do not reach plaintiff's other contention.


Summaries of

Turner v. Turner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 9, 1995
216 A.D.2d 910 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Turner v. Turner

Case Details

Full title:NICHOL TURNER, as Administratrix of the Estate of ROBERT TURNER, JR.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 9, 1995

Citations

216 A.D.2d 910 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
629 N.Y.S.2d 138

Citing Cases

Kimmel v. State of New York

Here, the execution of a stipulation in writing by prior counsel was sufficient to constitute an appearance…

Karamuco v. Gavriel Plaza, Inc.

The determination of whether an excuse is reasonable is committed to the sound discretion of the motion court…