Turner v. Tamko Bldg. Prods., Inc.

1 Citing case

  1. Powrzanas v. Jones Util. & Contracting Co.

    Case No. 2:17-cv-00975-TMP (N.D. Ala. Jun. 3, 2019)

    When opposing parties tell two different stories, one of which is blatantly contradicted by the record, so that no reasonable jury could believe it, a court should not adopt that version of the facts for purposes of ruling on a motion for summary judgment.Scott v. Harris, 550 U.S. 372, 380, 127 S. Ct. 1769, 1776, 167 L. Ed. 2d 686 (2007); see also Hammett v. Paulding County, 875 F.3d 1036, 1048-1049 (11th Cir. 2017); Turner v. Tamko Building Products, Inc., No. 7:11-CV-03741-TMP, 2013 WL 6636346, at *2 (N.D. Ala. Dec. 17, 2013) ("The evidence supporting a claim must be 'substantial.' Marcus v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co., 651 F.2d 379, 382 (5th Cir. 1981).