From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Turner v. Steve Brody, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 29, 1965
24 A.D.2d 904 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)

Opinion

November 29, 1965


In a proceeding for substitution of attorneys and the fixation of attorneys' liens, the plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered April 7, 1965 as: (1) fixed the lien of the outgoing attorneys at 10% of the recovery plus any out-of-pocket disbursements; and (2) provided that said disbursements shall be itemized by said attorneys and were to be paid before any papers in their possession were turned over to the substituted attorneys. Order modified on the law and the facts by striking out so much thereof as fixed the lien at 10% of the recovery plus any out-of-pocket disbursements and by substituting therefor provisions: (1) fixing a retaining lien in the sum of $500 on a quantum meruit basis, plus any out-of-pocket disbursements; (2) directing that the outgoing attorneys shall itemize said disbursements; and (3) directing that upon payment of said $500 and said disbursements to the outgoing attorneys, they shall turn over to the incoming attorneys all papers and documents in their possession relating to this case. As so modified, the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed, without costs. Although the outgoing attorneys were notified that they were discharged before they instituted any legal action, they had a retaining lien, as security for their fee, on papers and documents in their possession and, immediately upon their discharge, they were entitled to compensation on a quantum meruit basis plus reimbursement for their disbursements before they released this security ( Lebovic v. Ballantine Sons, 12 A.D.2d 494; Matter of Lerner v. Seigel, 22 A.D.2d 816). In our opinion, the sum of $500 is fair and reasonable compensation on a quantum meruit basis. On this record, we see no need for a plenary hearing. Christ, Acting P.J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Turner v. Steve Brody, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 29, 1965
24 A.D.2d 904 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)
Case details for

Turner v. Steve Brody, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JERI TURNER et al., Appellants, v. STEVE BRODY, INC., et al., Defendants…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 29, 1965

Citations

24 A.D.2d 904 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)

Citing Cases

Universal Acupuncture v. Quadrino Schwartz

Under New York law, a lawyer's right to recover in quantum meruit accrues immediately upon discharge. See…

Taraborrelli v. Vinciguerra

In our opinion, the facts disclosed by the record do not show that there was just cause for the discharge of…