From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Turner v. Mongitore

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 24, 2000
274 A.D.2d 512 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Argued May 4, 2000

July 24, 2000.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants Louise Nicosia and Robert Nicosia appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Levitt, J.), dated May 24, 1999, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against them.

Ahmuty, Demers McManus, Albertson, N.Y. (Frederick B. Simpson and Brendan T. Fitzpatrick of counsel), for appellants.

Schwartzapfel, Novick, Truhowsky Marcus, P.C., New York, N Y (Robert B. Marcus and Laurie A. Stanziale of counsel), for plaintiffs-respondents.

Frank V. Merlino (Sweetbaum Sweetbaum, Lake Success, N Y [Marshall D. Sweetbaum] of counsel), for defendants-respondents.

Before: CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with one bill of costs, the motion is granted, the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against the appellants are dismissed, and the action against the remaining defendants is severed.

The plaintiff Jesse Turner was riding in a car driven by the defendant John Mongitore and owned by the defendant Angelo Mongitore, when it crossed over into the opposite lane of traffic. The car collided head on with a vehicle driven by the appellant Robert Nicosia and owned by the appellant Louise Nicosia.

The appellants established that since Mongitore suddenly crossed over into Robert Nicosia's lane of traffic, the emergency doctrine applies and his actions must be judged in that context (see, Bentley v. Moore, 251 A.D.2d 612, 613). In response, the plaintiffs have failed to raise an issue of fact that Robert Nicosia's reaction to the emergency was unreasonable, or that any negligence on his part which may have occurred prior to the cross-over contributed to bringing about the emergency (see, Koch v. Levenson, 2 25 A.D.2d 592, 593; Lackner v. Roth, 166 A.D.2d 686, 687; Moller v. Lieber, 156 A.D.2d 434, 435).


Summaries of

Turner v. Mongitore

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 24, 2000
274 A.D.2d 512 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Turner v. Mongitore

Case Details

Full title:CATHERINE TURNER, ETC., ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. ANGELO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 24, 2000

Citations

274 A.D.2d 512 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
711 N.Y.S.2d 478

Citing Cases

Viera v. Lexington Leasing Co.

In addition, it is well settled that, under the emergency doctrine, "a driver is not required to anticipate…

Stoebe v. Norton

The appellants contend that Lisa Bergamini was negligent in operating the vehicle because she failed to take…