From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Turner v. Hudson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT COLUMBUS
Oct 28, 2015
Case No. 2:07-cv-595 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 28, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 2:07-cv-595

10-28-2015

MICHAEL R. TURNER, Petitioner, v. STUART HUDSON, Warden, Respondent.



Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (ECF No. 251), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired September 28, 2015, and for good cause shown upon the Court's de novo review, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Petitioner's Third Amended Petition (ECF No. 244) be dismissed without prejudice to possible allowance of Petitioner's pending motion to amend (ECF No. 253). October 28, 2015.

/s/_________

Timothy S. Black

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Turner v. Hudson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT COLUMBUS
Oct 28, 2015
Case No. 2:07-cv-595 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 28, 2015)
Case details for

Turner v. Hudson

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL R. TURNER, Petitioner, v. STUART HUDSON, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT COLUMBUS

Date published: Oct 28, 2015

Citations

Case No. 2:07-cv-595 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 28, 2015)