From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Turner v. Dickinson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 29, 2013
No. 2:09-cv-00632 GEB DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 29, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:09-cv-00632 GEB DAD P

01-29-2013

NATHAN KEVIN TURNER, Plaintiff, v. KATHLINE DICKINSON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

On January 23, 2013, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order filed January 8, 2013, denying plaintiff's request for the appointment of a medical expert. Defendants have filed an opposition. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

Plaintiff does not challenge that portion of the magistrate judge's order denying the request for appointment of counsel.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed January 8, 2013, is affirmed.

_________________________

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Turner v. Dickinson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 29, 2013
No. 2:09-cv-00632 GEB DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 29, 2013)
Case details for

Turner v. Dickinson

Case Details

Full title:NATHAN KEVIN TURNER, Plaintiff, v. KATHLINE DICKINSON, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 29, 2013

Citations

No. 2:09-cv-00632 GEB DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 29, 2013)