From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Turner v. Bodison

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA FLORENCE DIVISION
Mar 16, 2012
C/A No. 4:11-3177-RBH-TER (D.S.C. Mar. 16, 2012)

Opinion

C/A No. 4:11-3177-RBH-TER

03-16-2012

Joel Turner, Jr., Plaintiff, v. McKiether Bodison, Warden - Lieber Corr. Inst.; Fred B. Thompson, Associate Warden - Lieber Corr. Inst.; Dr. Babb, Doctor - Lieber Corr. Inst.; Starr Connelly, HCA - Lieber Corr. Inst.; Nurse Felder-Gatson, Lieber Corr. Inst., in his/her individual and official capacity, Defendants.


ORDER

This matter is before the court upon Plaintiff's motion entitled "Motion for Discovery and Disclosure of Evidence." (Doc. #30). It appears Plaintiff is asking the court to order Defendants to respond to discovery requests. Discovery requests are not filed with the court. See Local Rule 5.01, D.S.C. Generally, discovery is governed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Rules 26 through 38, generally. To the extent Plaintiff seeks a motion to compel, it is clear that such a request is premature. Therefore, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff's "Motion for Discovery and Disclosure of Evidence" is DENIED.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

Thomas E. Rogers, III

United States Magistrate Judge

March 16, 2012

Florence, South Carolina


Summaries of

Turner v. Bodison

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA FLORENCE DIVISION
Mar 16, 2012
C/A No. 4:11-3177-RBH-TER (D.S.C. Mar. 16, 2012)
Case details for

Turner v. Bodison

Case Details

Full title:Joel Turner, Jr., Plaintiff, v. McKiether Bodison, Warden - Lieber Corr…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA FLORENCE DIVISION

Date published: Mar 16, 2012

Citations

C/A No. 4:11-3177-RBH-TER (D.S.C. Mar. 16, 2012)