From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Turner v. Associated Indemnity Corporation

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jan 31, 1966
113 Ga. App. 225 (Ga. Ct. App. 1966)

Opinion

41528.

ARGUED SEPTEMBER 14, 1965.

DECIDED JANUARY 31, 1966. REHEARING DENIED FEBRUARY 23, 1966.

Action on insurance policy. Fulton Superior Court. Before Judge Moore.

Northcutt Edwards, W. S. Northcutt, for plaintiff in error.

Smith, Ringel, Martin Lowe, Sam F. Lowe, Jr., Ralph H. Witt, contra.


This is an action to recover upon an automobile liability insurance policy on account of injuries and damages to the plaintiff insured resulting from an automobile collision with a known uninsured motorist. The policy by its terms undertook "to pay all sums which the insured or his legal representative shall be legally entitled to recover as damages from the owner or operator of an uninsured automobile," as required by Ga. L. 1963, p. 588. The reasoning and the construction stated in State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Girtman, 113 Ga. App. 54 ( 147 S.E.2d 364), are applicable and controlling in this case. Girtman held that before suit could be brought against the insurer under this kind of coverage, it was an essential condition precedent that suit must first be brought and judgment recovered against the known uninsured motorist. As the petition here fails to show compliance with this condition, the trial court did not err in sustaining defendant's general demurrers and dismissing the plaintiff's petition.

Judgment affirmed. Frankum and Hall, JJ., concur.

ARGUED SEPTEMBER 14, 1965 — DECIDED JANUARY 31, 1966 — REHEARING DENIED FEBRUARY 23, 1966.


Summaries of

Turner v. Associated Indemnity Corporation

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jan 31, 1966
113 Ga. App. 225 (Ga. Ct. App. 1966)
Case details for

Turner v. Associated Indemnity Corporation

Case Details

Full title:TURNER v. ASSOCIATED INDEMNITY CORPORATION

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Jan 31, 1966

Citations

113 Ga. App. 225 (Ga. Ct. App. 1966)
147 S.E.2d 788

Citing Cases

Smith v. Allstate Insurance Co.

1), it is an essential condition precedent that suit must first be brought and judgment recovered against the…

Railey v. State Farm

"It is a condition precedent to an action against an automobile liability insurance carrier to recover under…