From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Turmelle v. Jefferson

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jan 14, 1938
166 Misc. 70 (N.Y. App. Term 1938)

Opinion

January 14, 1938.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, Third District.

L. Chester Glaser, for the appellant.

Erwin Kahn, for the respondent.


The authority and power of a court of record to require a party to give security for costs is purely statutory and must be found in the statute or it does not exist. There is no provision in the Civil Practice Act or Municipal Court Code whereby a non-resident defendant who has set up a counterclaim in his answer can be compelled to give security for costs.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.

All concur. Present — LYDON, HAMMER and FRANKENTHALER, JJ.


Summaries of

Turmelle v. Jefferson

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jan 14, 1938
166 Misc. 70 (N.Y. App. Term 1938)
Case details for

Turmelle v. Jefferson

Case Details

Full title:ALCIDE G. TURMELLE, Respondent, v. JAMES JEFFERSON, Appellant, and EDWIN…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Jan 14, 1938

Citations

166 Misc. 70 (N.Y. App. Term 1938)
2 N.Y.S.2d 30

Citing Cases

Richfield Oil Corp. v. LaPrade

The right to require security for costs has generally been regarded as wholly statutory, except perhaps where…

Matter of Flynn

Some are of the opinion that because the Supreme Court procedure applies expressly to a "plaintiff" it cannot…