Turek v. Orange County Sheriff's Dept.

Full title: VIKTOR A. TUREK, Plaintiff, v. ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT., Defendant.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Western Division

Date published: Dec 4, 2009

SACV 07-562-RGK (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 4, 2009)

Opinion

VIKTOR A. TUREK, Plaintiff, v. ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT., Defendant. No. SACV 07-562-RGK (AGR) United States District Court, C.D. California, Western Division. December 4, 2009

          ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

          R. GARY KLAUSNER, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the entire file de novo, including the Complaint, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the Objections to the Report and Recommendation, and all records in the file. Having made a de novo determination, the Court agrees with the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS ORDERED that (1) the Report and Recommendation is adopted; (2) the Second Amended Complaint is dismissed with prejudice; and (3) Plaintiff's motion for leave to file the Third Amended Complaint is denied with prejudice as to existing claims against Defendant Orange County Sheriff's Department and without prejudice as to claims against Robert Sutton and Jeff Brown.