From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tuppatsch v. Lopreto

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Mar 22, 2016
137 A.D.3d 608 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

568 115019/09.

03-22-2016

Meryl TUPPATSCH, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Virginia LoPRETO, Defendant–Appellant.

L'Abbate, Balkan, Colavita & Contini, L.L.P., Garden City (William T. McCaffery of counsel), for appellant. Steven L. Barkan, P.C., Melville (Steven L. Barkan of counsel), for respondent.


L'Abbate, Balkan, Colavita & Contini, L.L.P., Garden City (William T. McCaffery of counsel), for appellant.

Steven L. Barkan, P.C., Melville (Steven L. Barkan of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan M. Kenney, J.), entered August 11, 2014, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied defendant's motion to dismiss the first cause of action for legal malpractice, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In her first cause of action, plaintiff alleges that defendant attorney was negligent in, among other things, failing to advise her of her rights in an underlying divorce proceeding, and in pressuring her to settle the action before trial. According to plaintiff, but for defendant's negligence, she would have recovered a larger equitable distribution.

Defendant moved to dismiss plaintiff's malpractice claim, based on the express terms of the settlement agreement, in which plaintiff acknowledged that she was apprised of her rights and that she was not entering into the settlement agreement under duress. In opposition to defendant's motion, plaintiff submitted her affidavit and several emails between the parties, in which plaintiff complains about defendant's representation of her during settlement negotiations and defendant urges plaintiff to settle the matter and contemplates withdrawal as counsel.

Under the circumstances, the motion court correctly sustained the first cause of action because plaintiff has properly pleaded a cause of action for legal malpractice (see Fielding v. Kupferman, 65 A.D.3d 437, 885 N.Y.S.2d 24 1st Dept.2009 ). Her affidavit and attached emails are sufficient to support her allegations (see generally Global Bus. Inst. v. Rivkin Radler LLP, 101 A.D.3d 651, 651, 958 N.Y.S.2d 41 1st Dept.2012 ).

SWEENY, J.P., RENWICK, MOSKOWITZ, GISCHE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Tuppatsch v. Lopreto

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Mar 22, 2016
137 A.D.3d 608 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Tuppatsch v. Lopreto

Case Details

Full title:Meryl Tuppatsch, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Virginia LoPreto…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 22, 2016

Citations

137 A.D.3d 608 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 2034
26 N.Y.S.3d 704

Citing Cases

Englese v. Steven Sladkus, Esq.

According to plaintiffs, defendants made affirmative representations to plaintiffs regarding the value of the…