Tunstall v. Knowles

Full title: ROBERT TUNSTALL, Plaintiff, v. MIKE KNOWLES, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jul 24, 2013

2:08-cv-3176 WBS JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jul. 24, 2013)

Opinion

ROBERT TUNSTALL, Plaintiff, v. MIKE KNOWLES, et al., Defendants. No. 2:08-cv-3176 WBS JFM (PC) United States District Court, E.D. California. July 24, 2013

          ORDER

          KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.

         Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding through counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has filed, pro se, two motions for injunctive relief and one motion for a court order. Because plaintiff is represented by counsel, plaintiff's pro se motions will be denied without prejudice.

         In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. Plaintiff's September 4, 2012 motion (ECF No. 169) is denied without prejudice;

         2. Plaintiff's November 2, 2012 motion (ECF No. 170) is denied without prejudice; and

         3. Plaintiff's November 6, 2012 motion (ECF No. 171) is denied without prejudice.