From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tuner v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Oct 11, 2005
No. 05-04-01180-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 11, 2005)

Opinion

No. 05-04-01180-CR

Opinion Filed October 11, 2005. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex.R.App.P. 47.

On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. F03-57367-NU. Affirmed.

Before Justices MORRIS, WRIGHT, and RICHTER.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Herman Edward Turner, Jr. pleaded guilty to burglary of a habitation and true to one enhancement paragraph. The trial court assessed punishment at twenty-five years' imprisonment and a $2000 fine. Appellant's attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant he has a right to file a pro se response. Appellant, however, did not file a pro se response. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. We affirm the trial court's judgment.


Summaries of

Tuner v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Oct 11, 2005
No. 05-04-01180-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 11, 2005)
Case details for

Tuner v. State

Case Details

Full title:HERMAN EDWARD TURNER, JR., Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Oct 11, 2005

Citations

No. 05-04-01180-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 11, 2005)