From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tucker v. U.S. Small Business Administration

United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division
Mar 8, 2010
CIVIL ACTION FILE NO. 1:09-CV-2723-TWT (N.D. Ga. Mar. 8, 2010)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION FILE NO. 1:09-CV-2723-TWT.

March 8, 2010


ORDER


This is an employment discrimination action. It is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 11] of the Magistrate Judge recommending granting the Defendant Karen Mills's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 7]. The Plaintiff's Objections to the Report and Recommendation are incomprehensible. The Court approves and adopts the Report and Recommendation as the judgment of the Court. The Defendant Karen Mills's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 7] is GRANTED. The Plaintiff is ordered to show cause in writing within 10 days from the date of this Order why Rule 11 sanctions should not be imposed for filing this frivolous lawsuit and failing to comply with the Court's Order dismissing a prior lawsuit.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Tucker v. U.S. Small Business Administration

United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division
Mar 8, 2010
CIVIL ACTION FILE NO. 1:09-CV-2723-TWT (N.D. Ga. Mar. 8, 2010)
Case details for

Tucker v. U.S. Small Business Administration

Case Details

Full title:ARCHIE L. TUCKER, Plaintiff, v. U.S. SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, et…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division

Date published: Mar 8, 2010

Citations

CIVIL ACTION FILE NO. 1:09-CV-2723-TWT (N.D. Ga. Mar. 8, 2010)

Citing Cases

Homecare CRM, LLC v. Adam Group, Inc.

Consequently, Rule 11(c) authorizes a court to impose appropriate sanctions on an attorney or party for Rule…