From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tucker v. Colvin

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California, Sacramento Division
Apr 17, 2015
2:13-cv-02185-EFB (E.D. Cal. Apr. 17, 2015)

Opinion

          BENJAMIN B. WAGNER, United States Attorney, DONNA L. CALVERT, Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX, Social Security Administration PAUL SACHELARI, Special Assistant United States Attorney Social Security Administration, San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for Defendant.

          Law Offices of Campbell & Clark, ROBERT N. CAMPBELL, Attroney for Plaintiff.


          STIPULATION FOR AWARD OF EAJA FEES

          EDMUND F. BRENNAN, Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, and with the approval of the Court as provided below, that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), in the amount of two thousand two hundred dollars ($2, 200.00), and costs in the amount of four hundred dollars ($400) under 28 U.S.C. § 1920. This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 1920, 2412(d).

         After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the government will consider the matter of Plaintiff's assignment of EAJA fees to Plaintiff's attorney. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (U.S. June 14, 2010), the ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury's Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees is entered, the government will determine whether they are subject to any offset.

         Fees and costs shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the payment of fees and costs to be made directly to plaintiff's counsel Robert N. Campbell, pursuant to the assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any payments made shall be delivered to Plaintiff's counsel Robert N. Campbell.

         This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff's request for EAJA attorney fees and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the EAJA. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or Plaintiff's counsel may have relating to EAJA attorney fees connection with this action.

          ORDER

         APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Tucker v. Colvin

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California, Sacramento Division
Apr 17, 2015
2:13-cv-02185-EFB (E.D. Cal. Apr. 17, 2015)
Case details for

Tucker v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:JAMES L. TUCKER, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California, Sacramento Division

Date published: Apr 17, 2015

Citations

2:13-cv-02185-EFB (E.D. Cal. Apr. 17, 2015)