From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tucker v. Cline

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 18, 2013
No. 2:13-cv-0279 KJM DAD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:13-cv-0279 KJM DAD P

03-18-2013

GERALD L. TUCKER, Plaintiff, v. PHILLIP CLINE et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has not filed a request to proceed in forma pauperis. In his complaint, plaintiff alleges violations of his civil rights by defendants. The alleged violations took place in Tulare County, which is part of the Fresno Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. See Local Rule 120(d).

Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper division of a court may, on the court's own motion, be transferred to the proper division of the court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the court.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California sitting in Fresno; and

2. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and shall be filed at:

United States District Court

Eastern District of California

2500 Tulare Street

Fresno, CA 93721

________________________

DALE A. DROZD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DAD:9
tuck0279.22


Summaries of

Tucker v. Cline

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 18, 2013
No. 2:13-cv-0279 KJM DAD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 2013)
Case details for

Tucker v. Cline

Case Details

Full title:GERALD L. TUCKER, Plaintiff, v. PHILLIP CLINE et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 18, 2013

Citations

No. 2:13-cv-0279 KJM DAD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 2013)