From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tsikis v. Pantelides

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 20, 2013
104 A.D.3d 841 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-03-20

Evanthia TSIKIS, appellant, v. Peter PANTELIDES, et al., respondents.

Sacco & Fillas, LLP, Astoria, N.Y. (Si Aydiner of counsel), for appellant. James J. Toomey, New York, N.Y. (Evy L. Kazansky of counsel), for respondents.



Sacco & Fillas, LLP, Astoria, N.Y. (Si Aydiner of counsel), for appellant. James J. Toomey, New York, N.Y. (Evy L. Kazansky of counsel), for respondents.
MARK C. DILLON, J.P., RUTH C. BALKIN, THOMAS A. DICKERSON, and SYLVIA HINDS–RADIX, JJ.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ruchelsman, J.), dated September 2, 2011, which granted the defendants' motionfor summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

On April 11, 2007, the plaintiff allegedly fell while ascending a two-step exterior staircase located at a private home in Bay Ridge. Prior to her fall, the plaintiff frequently visited this home to care for its elderly owner and resident, Kalliope Pantelides (hereinafter the decedent). In 2008, the plaintiff commenced this action against the decedent. The decedent died during the pendency of the action and the administrators of her estate were substituted as the defendants. Thereafter, the Supreme Court granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

The defendants established their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting the plaintiff's deposition testimony, in which she was unable to identify the cause of her accident without engaging in speculation ( see Rizos v. Galini Seafood Rest., 89 A.D.3d 1004, 933 N.Y.S.2d 703;Thompson v. Commack Multiplex Cinemas, 83 A.D.3d 929, 930, 921 N.Y.S.2d 304;Reiff v. Beechwood Browns Rd. Bldg. Corp., 54 A.D.3d 1015, 1015, 864 N.Y.S.2d 175). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to submit evidence sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact ( see Alvarez v. Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320, 508 N.Y.S.2d 923, 501 N.E.2d 572). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.


Summaries of

Tsikis v. Pantelides

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 20, 2013
104 A.D.3d 841 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

Tsikis v. Pantelides

Case Details

Full title:Evanthia TSIKIS, appellant, v. Peter PANTELIDES, et al., respondents.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 20, 2013

Citations

104 A.D.3d 841 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
961 N.Y.S.2d 298
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 1821