From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

TSE v. APPLE INC

United States District Court, N.D. California
May 15, 2007
No. C 06-06573 SBA (N.D. Cal. May. 15, 2007)

Opinion

No. C 06-06573 SBA.

May 15, 2007


ORDER


On May 11, 2007 plaintiff submitted a letter to this Court requesting that the plaintiff be excused from personally attending the ENE hearing scheduled for May 18, 2007 because he cannot obtain a visa to travel from China. See Docket No. 65. On May 13, 2007 plaintiff submitted an identical letter request to Magistrate Judge Brazil. See Docket No. 66. Under ADR Local Rules 2-2 and 5-10(d), the plaintiff should have submitted his request to Judge Brazil, not this Court. ADR Local Rule 2-2 states: "The ADR Magistrate Judge [i.e., Judge Brazil] shall rule on all requests to be excused from appearing in person at arbitration, ENE and mediation sessions, and shall hear and determine all complaints alleging violations of these ADR local rules." Rule 5-10(d) states:

A person who is required to attend an ENE session may be excused from attending in person only after a showing that personal attendance would impose an extraordinary or otherwise unjustifiable hardship. A person seeking to be excused must submit, no fewer than 15 days before the date set for the session, a letter to the ADR Magistrate Judge , simultaneously copying the ADR Unit, all counsel and the evaluator.

(Emphasis added). Accordingly, this Court will not pass on the letter request because it is not properly before this Court, and the matter shall be handled by Judge Brazil as is appropriate under the Local Rules.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

TSE v. APPLE INC

United States District Court, N.D. California
May 15, 2007
No. C 06-06573 SBA (N.D. Cal. May. 15, 2007)
Case details for

TSE v. APPLE INC

Case Details

Full title:HO KEUNG TSE, Plaintiff, v. APPLE INC. et al., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: May 15, 2007

Citations

No. C 06-06573 SBA (N.D. Cal. May. 15, 2007)