From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tschida v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Nov 30, 2006
942 So. 2d 921 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Opinion

No. 2D06-3291.

October 27, 2006. Rehearing Denied November 30, 2006.

Appeal pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Roger Allan Alcott, Judge.


Affirmed. See Burrows v. State, 890 So.2d 286 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004), review denied, 914 So.2d 952 (Fla. 2005); Caraballo v. State, 805 So.2d 882 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). Contrary to the holding of this court in Burrows, the First District in Isaac v. State, 911 So.2d 813 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005), on collateral review applied the United States Supreme Court decision in Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), retroactively to a sentence that became final before the issuance of the Blakely opinion. As this court did in Hughes v. State, 933 So.2d 1285 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006), we certify direct conflict with Isaac.

Affirmed; conflict certified.

WHATLEY, CASANUEVA, and SILBERMAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Tschida v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Nov 30, 2006
942 So. 2d 921 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
Case details for

Tschida v. State

Case Details

Full title:David TSCHIDA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Nov 30, 2006

Citations

942 So. 2d 921 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)