From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tsabbar v. Auld

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 31, 2000
276 A.D.2d 442 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

October 31, 2000.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Paula Omansky, J.), entered October 13, 1999, which denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment declaring (1) that the contracts entered by plaintiff dentist with other health care professionals are license agreements, and (2) that the proprietary lease does not require review and/or approval by defendant cooperative's Board of Directors of such agreement, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Daniel Finkelstein, for plaintiff-appellant.

Glen Parker, for defendants-respondents.

Before: Sullivan, P.J., Rosenberger, Ellerin, Wallach, Rubin, JJ.


Because plaintiff's agreements with other health care professionals granted an "exclusive right to use and occupy" part of plaintiff's apartment at certain times, they were not mere licenses, but subleases for which approval was required under plaintiff's proprietary lease with defendant cooperative corporation (see, Miller v. City of New York, 15 N.Y.2d 34).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Tsabbar v. Auld

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 31, 2000
276 A.D.2d 442 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Tsabbar v. Auld

Case Details

Full title:ZION TSABBAR, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. MARYANN AULD, ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 31, 2000

Citations

276 A.D.2d 442 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
714 N.Y.S.2d 489

Citing Cases

Theatre Row Phase II Associates v. National Recording Studios, Inc.

Although the parties' lease gave the tenant the right to license the use of the leased premises to others, we…

Tsabbar, D.D.S. v. Auld

Plaintiff's motion to vacate prior orders was properly denied since the claims made by plaintiff in support…