From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trustees of Freeholders v. Heilner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 8, 1988
143 A.D.2d 134 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

August 8, 1988

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gowan, J.).


Ordered that the order and judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion to dismiss is denied.

This action arises out of the appellant's attempt to purchase a plot of land in Shinnecock Bay in Southampton and erect a motel on it. The plaintiff commenced this action by service of a summons and complaint in June 1972 on the theory that it owned the subject land beneath the waters of Shinnecock Bay to the high-water mark. De Marco asserted counterclaims for damages based upon slander of title. The complaint was dismissed after trial in a judgment entered April 9, 1976, which provided that the counterclaims against plaintiff "shall be tried upon 30 days notice at any time after the entry of this Order". Following numerous court actions and proceedings concerning the property in issue during the ensuing years, De Marco filed a notice of trial of the counterclaims nearly 10 years later, on January 14, 1986. The plaintiff then moved to dismiss the counterclaims as abandoned pursuant to CPLR 3404.

The self-executing provision of CPLR 3404 which authorizes the clerk of the court to dismiss an action for neglect to prosecute is inapplicable at bar, as there is no evidence that De Marco's counterclaims had ever been "marked 'off' or struck from the calendar or unanswered on a clerk's calendar call". Under the unusual circumstances in this case, there is no legal basis for the dismissal of De Marco's counterclaims on the grounds of abandonment, notwithstanding his inordinate delay in filing a notice of trial. There was no indication of any intent on De Marco's part to abandon the counterclaims during the interval between entry of judgment in his favor on the complaint and his notice of trial (see, Thompson v Thompson, 103 A.D.2d 772). Therefore, the counterclaims were not properly dismissed. Mangano, J.P., Brown, Lawrence and Harwood, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Trustees of Freeholders v. Heilner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 8, 1988
143 A.D.2d 134 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

Trustees of Freeholders v. Heilner

Case Details

Full title:TRUSTEES OF THE FREEHOLDERS AND COMMONALTY OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHAMPTON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 8, 1988

Citations

143 A.D.2d 134 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

State v. Warren Brothers Co., Inc.

Since the parties validly agreed to extend the restoration deadline to at least July 1, 1989, the Supreme…

Partnership 92 v. Dobrolowicz

There is no legal basis for the denial of the motion of Eva Bogushawa Dobrolowicz to place her counterclaims…