From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trust Co. v. Green

Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia
Feb 17, 1925
98 W. Va. 200 (W. Va. 1925)

Opinion

C. C. 330.

Submitted February 11, 1925.

Decided February 17, 1925.

Case certified from Circuit Court, Kanawha County.

Suit by the Central Trust Company against Geraldine R. Green and others. From a decree of the court of common pleas an appeal was taken to the circuit court, in which the decree appealed from was affirmed, and the court certified for review its action on demurrer to amended bill.

Dismissed.

Poffenbarger, Blue Dayton, for plaintiff.

Byrne, Littlepage Lynn, for defendants.


This cause is improperly here on certificate from the Circuit Court of Kanawha County. The record shows that the cause was heard by the Court of Common Pleas of Kanawha County, on the bill, amended bill, demurrer thereto, and certain answers, and that the court on consideration thereof entered a decree adjudicating the principles of the cause. On appeal to the Circuit Court, the decree of the lower court was affirmed, and in the same order the court certified for review its action on the demurrer, under section 1 of chapter 135, Code. The principles of the cause having been finally adjudicated, both by the Common Pleas Court and the Circuit on appeal, the questions arising thereunder can only be brought here on appeal. This Court has no jurisdiction to determine the questions certified. Heater v. Lloyd, 85 W. Va. 570; Gas Company v. Shreve, 90 W. Va. 277; Marks v. Mitchell, 90 W. Va. 702; and Lee v. City of Elkins, 97 W. Va. 183, 124 S.E. 499.

Dismissed.


Summaries of

Trust Co. v. Green

Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia
Feb 17, 1925
98 W. Va. 200 (W. Va. 1925)
Case details for

Trust Co. v. Green

Case Details

Full title:CENTRAL TRUST COMPANY v . GERALDINE R. GREEN et al

Court:Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia

Date published: Feb 17, 1925

Citations

98 W. Va. 200 (W. Va. 1925)
127 S.E. 32

Citing Cases

State of West Virginia v. Webb Holesapple

This Court has repeatedly held that it is without jurisdiction to review on certificate a ruling on a…