Truschke v. Shasta Superior Court

Full title: JAMES E. TRUSCHKE, JR., Petitioner, v. SHASTA SUPERIOR COURT, et al.…

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jun 24, 2015

2:15-cv-0702 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 24, 2015)

Opinion

JAMES E. TRUSCHKE, JR., Petitioner, v. SHASTA SUPERIOR COURT, et al., Respondents. No. 2:15-cv-0702 CKD P United States District Court, E.D. California. June 24, 2015

          ORDER

          CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge.

         By order filed May 12, 2015, petitioner's habeas application was dismissed and thirty days' leave to file an amended application was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and petitioner has not filed an amended petition. Petitioner has consented to this court's jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c0 and Local Rule 302.

         Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).