From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Truong v. Dart Container Corporation

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 26, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-3348 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 26, 2010)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

concluding that plaintiffs' assertions that defendant "`discriminated against the plaintiffs and treated them differently'" because of their Vietnamese nationality were conclusory allegations restating the elements of a prima facie case of discrimination

Summary of this case from Yeakel v. Cleveland Steel Container Corp.
See 5 Summaries

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-3348.

October 26, 2010

ORDER

LAWRENCE STENGEL, District Judge

AND NOW, this 25th day of October, 2010, upon consideration of the defendant's motion to dismiss (Document #3), the plaintiff's response thereto (Document #4), and the defendant's reply (Document #15), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED in its entirety.

The Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED for all purposes.

Summaries of

Truong v. Dart Container Corporation

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 26, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-3348 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 26, 2010)

concluding that plaintiffs' assertions that defendant "`discriminated against the plaintiffs and treated them differently'" because of their Vietnamese nationality were conclusory allegations restating the elements of a prima facie case of discrimination

Summary of this case from Yeakel v. Cleveland Steel Container Corp.

In Truong v. Dart Container Corp., 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 114286, 8–9, 2010 WL 4237944, 3–4 (E.D.Pa. Oct. 25, 2010), the plaintiffs alleged they were the discriminated against based on their national origin.

Summary of this case from Kiniropoulos v. Northampton Cnty. Child Welfare Serv.

In Truong v. Dart Container Corp., 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 114286, 8-9 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 25, 2010), the plaintiffs alleged they were the discriminated against based on their national origin.

Summary of this case from Kiniropoulos v. Northampton Cnty. Child Welfare Serv.

dismissing plaintiffs' section 1981 claim where plaintiffs "failed to allege any facts from which a discriminatory animus on the part of the defendant might be inferred"

Summary of this case from Deserne v. Madlyn Leonard Abramson Center

looking to elements of prima facie employment discrimination case in analyzing Rule 12(b) motion to dismiss

Summary of this case from SABLAN v. A.B. WON PAT INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY
Case details for

Truong v. Dart Container Corporation

Case Details

Full title:ANH TRUONG, et al., Plaintiffs v. DART CONTAINER CORPORATION, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 26, 2010

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-3348 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 26, 2010)

Citing Cases

Moffitt v. Tunkhannock Area Sch. Dist.

“Pennsylvania courts have recognized such public policy exceptions rarely and only where a clear mandate of…

Yeakel v. Cleveland Steel Container Corp.

Plaintiff's allegation that other laborers were hired is not a legal conclusion merely couched as a…

10 Citing Cases