Accordingly, the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state-law claims that concern predominately state-law issues. See, e.g., Do v. Bank of Am. Corp., No. C 11-01467 SBA, 2012 WL 1094451, at *4 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 29, 2012) (declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction after dismissing federal claims when action was before court for one year and four days); Cruz v. Mortg. Lenders Network, No. 09-cv-1679 BEN (AJB), 2010 WL 3745932, at *4-5 (S.D. Cal. Sept. 20, 2010) (declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction after dismissing federal claims when action was before court for one year, one month, and sixteen days); Perez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. C-11-02279 JCS, 2013 WL 892746, at *14 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2013) (declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction after dismissing federal claims when action was before court for over one and one half years). CONCLUSION