From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trujillo v. State

Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
Jun 11, 2013
No. 06-13-00040-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 11, 2013)

Opinion

No. 06-13-00040-CR No. 06-13-00041-CR

06-11-2013

JONATHAN TRUJILLO, Appellant v. STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the 8th District Court

Hopkins County, Texas

Trial Court Nos. 0920903 & 0921175


Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

ORDER

Cynthia L. Braddy, counsel for the appellant, Jonathan Trujillo, has filed a motion to extend time to file the appellant's brief. The brief was due May 30, 2013.

In her motion, counsel does not provide the Court with a reasonable explanation of the need for an extension of time. This Court interprets Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 10.5(b)(2) as requiring counsel to provide the Court with specific information to justify the requested extension, including the cause numbers of other briefs filed, the dates they were filed, the dates of trials, how long those trials are expected to last, etc. Broad, general statements do not provide the required facts and are not adequate to meet the requirements of the rule. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b)(2).

All future motions to extend time must contain case-specific information adequate to justify the request, or they will be denied.

In this instance, we grant the motion for an extension, for a period of thirty days, making appellant's brief now due July 1, 2013. Further requests for extensions will not be looked upon with favor.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT


Summaries of

Trujillo v. State

Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
Jun 11, 2013
No. 06-13-00040-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 11, 2013)
Case details for

Trujillo v. State

Case Details

Full title:JONATHAN TRUJILLO, Appellant v. STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

Date published: Jun 11, 2013

Citations

No. 06-13-00040-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 11, 2013)