From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trujillo v. Stainer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 11, 2013
1:12-cv-00817-LJO-JLT (HC) (E.D. Cal. Mar. 11, 2013)

Opinion

1:12-cv-00817-LJO-JLT (HC)

03-11-2013

SAMUEL TRUJILLO, Petitioner, v. M. STAINER, Respondent.


ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO PROCEED

IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON APPEAL

and

DIRECTING CLERK TO SERVE

THE COURT OF APPEALS


(Doc. 21)

Petitioner is a prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

On October 19, 2012, judgment was entered dismissing the petition for writ of habeas corpus. On November 16, 2012, petitioner filed a notice of appeal, a motion for certificate of appealability and an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Examination of petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis reveals that petitioner is unable to afford the costs of an appeal. Accordingly, the application to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is GRANTED. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915. The Clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order on the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Jennifer L. Thurston

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Trujillo v. Stainer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 11, 2013
1:12-cv-00817-LJO-JLT (HC) (E.D. Cal. Mar. 11, 2013)
Case details for

Trujillo v. Stainer

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL TRUJILLO, Petitioner, v. M. STAINER, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 11, 2013

Citations

1:12-cv-00817-LJO-JLT (HC) (E.D. Cal. Mar. 11, 2013)