From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trueax v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton
Jan 12, 2009
Case No. 3:08-cv-103 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 12, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 3:08-cv-103.

January 12, 2009


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS


The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. #12), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) expired on January 9, 2009, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Commissioner's decision that Plaintiff was not disabled and therefore not entitled to benefits under the Act be AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Trueax v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton
Jan 12, 2009
Case No. 3:08-cv-103 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 12, 2009)
Case details for

Trueax v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL TRUEAX, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton

Date published: Jan 12, 2009

Citations

Case No. 3:08-cv-103 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 12, 2009)

Citing Cases

Antico v. Astrue

Most frequently this occurs when the original IQ determination was near the upper end of the 60-70 mild…