Summary
finding that the ALJ did not fail to account for a condition in formulating the RFC where there was a lack of evidence that the condition limited plaintiff's work abilities
Summary of this case from Kutscher v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin.Opinion
NO. 1:10-CV-00755
02-29-2012
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (doc. 19), to which there were no objections.
Proper Notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). As of the date of this Order, no objections have been filed.
Having reviewed this matter de novo pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court finds the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation thorough, well-reasoned, and correct.
Accordingly, the Court hereby ADOPTS and AFFIRMS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (doc. 19) in all respects, AFFIRMS the decision of the Commissioner denying Plaintiff disability benefits and supplemental security income, and DISMISSES this matter from the docket.
SO ORDERED.
_______________
S. Arthur Spiegel
United States Senior District Judge